Strategic Digital Outreach

The Purpose of a Church Website

In a blog post entitled Supercharging Sermons With A Blog, Paul Steinbrueck of OurChurch.com talks about three purposes of a church website:

1) to help people looking for a church home;
2) to assist people already attending the church to know what ministries and activities are available for them; and,
3) to help people grow spiritually by providing additional resources that complement the services and ministries.

Regarding those three purposes of a church website, it seems to me (just my opinion) that there are better ways to accomplish the second and third purposes than a publicly available church website (I would advocate approaches which convey information to already-existing members and attendees through face-to-face community — small groups, for example). My fear is that in trying to be all things to all people, we will end up serving no one.

For example, I’ve said before that most unbelievers don’t care about our ministries because they can’t envision a time when they would ever want to be involved in those programs. In fact, I would venture a guess that the “Ministries” page on most church websites would actually deter many unbelievers from joining us because most church ministries are so focused on those who are “in the know” - with descriptions couched in Christianese, with very little real focus on unbelievers, and with little thought given to how an unbeliever might perceive the nature of those ministries.

In addition, my fear is that with limited resources and budget, efforts to maintain a church website will naturally gravitate to those items which serve already-existing members and attendees while items which are targeted toward unbelievers (which a church website is uniquely poised to deliver) will fall by the wayside.

I might also add that the first purpose (to help people looking for a church home) only targets a small segment of people outside the church. The vast majority of unbelievers are simply not “looking for a church home.” They think we are irrelevant.

I would much rather see us focus our efforts on using church websites to intrigue unbelievers enough to want to join us in our gatherings, and I’m not sure we can do that effectively while including a major emphasis on serving people who are already part of our churches.

Some churches create two sites — one site for members and attendees and an additional site for non-attendees. Other churches create a special members’ section, accessible through a login. I’m not sure I like either of these approaches as they both tend to create a presentation which inadvertently says to unbelievers, “You’re not part of our club.” For that reason, I’m not particularly enamored of either of these solutions.

I recognize that I am almost certainly in the minority with my opinion on these issues, so I am genuinely interested in the perspective of others and further discussion. Please feel free, as always, to comment.

Related Article
Effective Church Websites For Emerging Generations

Posted by on 03/07 at 12:18 PM
The Collective Voice!
Christian Web Trends Blog continues the discussion:

Hi Frank,

Thanks for commenting on the Supercharging Sermons With A Blog.  I just wanted to clarify that I agree there are better ways to help attenders of a church to find ministry opportunities and to grow spiritually than through the church website.  The idea is for the church website to AUGMENT those ways not replace them.  It’s not unlike a church mailing members a church calendar or a Portals of Prayer devotional to augment the informing and discipleship of the congregation.  Except those things can be created, updated, and distributed more efficiently and interactively online than on paper.

Some unbelievers are open to hearing about God in the context of a church and some wouldn’t be caught dead in a church.  I believe a church website can support believers and still be friendly to spiritual seekers who are open to hearing about God in a church setting as long as the church is intentional about doing it in an engaging, inclusive way that avoids Christianese.

Those people who wouldn’t be caught dead in a church, probably also wouldn’t be caught dead on a church website.  So, if a church has a vision for a website that engages unbelievers in this group, I agree with you that a separate website would be the way to go.

Paul Steinbrueck
OurChurch.Com

contributed on 03/07 at 04:10 PM
continues the discussion:

Paul:

Thanks so much for stopping by and continuing the discussion - I really appreciate it.

Let me ask you a question:

If, by using the church website to augment the more face-to-face ways of notifying members of ministry opportunities and helping them grow spiritually, we actually hinder the effort to attract unbelievers, is that a good thing? I don’t think so.

The problem is that it is easy for those responsible for developing church websites to create content which serves members and regular attendees. But in doing so, often there is not time or resources to devote to efforts to attract unbelievers. And so the church website ends up being, by default, an internal communications device. To me, that’s a wasted opportunity.

I long for a cyberspace version of Romans 15:20-21: “And thus I aspired to preach the gospel, not where Christ was already named, so that I would not build on another man’s foundation; but as it is written, ‘THEY WHO HAD NO NEWS OF HIM SHALL SEE, AND THEY WHO HAVE NOT HEARD SHALL UNDERSTAND.’”

You’re right - those who wouldn’t be caught dead in a church probably also wouldn’t be caught dead on a church website. That’s not because we don’t have the opportunity to attract them to our websites, but instead because we have nothing of interest to say to them.

If, instead of spending all of our time on church websites talking about our service schedules, our ministries, our pastors’ backgrounds, etc., etc., we devoted our efforts to presenting the stories of real people - people with leukemia, people who love gardening, people who have struggled with financial difficulties, etc. - then we might attract those unbelievers who wouldn’t be caught dead in a church to come to our website.

When they read our compelling stories and see that we are real people with the same struggles and interests they have but with a different approach to coping with those struggles and enjoying those interests, perhaps they would want to meet us. And then we have attracted them to the real life of the church - which happens not only on Sundays, but throughout the week.

Again, I’m definitely in the minority on this. Thanks again for your contribution.

contributed on 03/07 at 04:45 PM
Christian Web Trends Blog continues the discussion:

>If, by using the church website to augment the more face-to-face ways of notifying members of ministry opportunities and helping them grow spiritually, we actually hinder the effort to attract unbelievers, is that a good thing? I don,t think so.

Frank, the premise of your question is that it is impossible for a church website to edify and connect believers and be attractive to believers at the same time.  I disagree with that premise.

Yes, most church websites tend to cater to church members rather than unbelievers but it doesn’t have to be that way.  The solution is to create church websites that are inclusive and non-threatening to unbelievers not to scrap everything that might be helpful to believers.

I think you are overlooking the fact that many unbelievers would find an organization that shows genuine care for the poor, the lonely, the hurting, and the confused very appealing.  Many unbelievers are looking for a place they can find meaning, purpose, and genuine acceptance.  For a church to hide “serving opportunities” and ways to “get connected” would be missing out an opportunity to appeal to these spiritual seekers.

>I long for a cyberspace version of Romans 15:20-21

That’s awesome!  You obviously have a big heart for anti-church unbelievers and I applaud that.  But a church can’t effectively minister to anti-church people without hiding a large part of what it is.  You yourself said a church website can’t be all things to all people.  In my opinion, your strategy would essentially result in the church abandoning the group of unbelievers it is best equipped to appeal to in an attempt to appeal to those it is least equipped to appeal to.

I believe a more effective strategy is to let local churches be who they are and appeal to people who are open to hearing God’s word and finding meaningful relationships in the context of church.  And then in addition to that local churches can target anti-church unbelievers by commissioning separate websites and even cyber missionaries specifically for that purpose.

Paul Steinbrueck
OurChurch.Com

contributed on 03/08 at 06:36 AM
Bobby R Awtrey continues the discussion:

Justa few comments on how we use the Internet for our church. We are located in Savannah Georgia, a well known tourist town. Many people coming to Savannah go to a variety of Internet resources looking for various places to visit while here. By posting our website link in a multitude of places over the net ... people come to our website and at least find out we exist.

We have been blessed with a large number of tourist visiting with us for our services. We are not out for numbers ....so knowing that these visitors are not local gives us an opportunity to minister to people away from home.

Also, we have found by having our website that we have been of service to people requesting information about the church and our city prior to making a move to Savannah.

Another great service we have been able to supply that we had never consdiered when developing a website ...is this ... We get calls and e-mails from people looking for relatives or children that might have run away from home and ended up in Savannah. We have experienced numerous success stories from this new found ministry.

Since having a website I have had the opportunity to receive questions from many “unchurched” people ... an dhave built a long lasting relationship by being available to them both via e-mail and personal phone calls.

The list goes on and on concerning the many advantages of our Internet ministry. As stated by others ... this in no way takes the place of one-on-one personal contact ... not do we expect our congregation to simply use it as the place they get information about our servcies .... that comes from visitation and a lot of effort going out into the highways and byways of Savannah spreading the Gospel to the lost and inviting them to come and enjoy the worship experience with us.

Just thought I would add my two cents worth to the Blog ..... Minsitry is Fun !!!! Everyday is a Party ....and we have already recieved our Gift from God .... Our Salvation through his son Jesus !!!

Come Smile with us !!!! we are a light shining out to The Islands Community in Savannah, Georgia !!!!

contributed on 03/09 at 01:08 PM
continues the discussion:

Paul:

Thanks for your response. A few points:

1) I’m not saying that we should “scrap everything that might be helpful to believers.” I’m only saying that we shouldn’t give those things as much prominence as we do, and we should be putting the bulk of our efforts into providing materials targeted toward unbelievers. Sure, have the service schedule, ministries page, etc. But if we find ourselves devoting the bulk of our time and effort to maintaining those pages and not creating and maintaining pages of information which are relevant to unbelievers, then I think we have to ask ourselves if we’re headed down the wrong path.

2) You said that “many unbelievers would find an organization that shows genuine care for the poor, the lonely, the hurting, and the confused very appealing.” I agree completely! But I don’t see many ministry pages on church websites which reflect how the church shows that care. Instead, I read about Bible studies, prayer groups, youth groups, Sunday school classes, worship teams. All of these are fine, but to the average unbeliever, I think they have nothing to do with showing genuine care for the poor, the lonely, etc. Why not tell stories of how the poor were helped by our ministries with the idea of letting unbelievers know that our “ministries” (although I wouldn’t probably use that term) are not inwardly-focused?

3) You said that my premise is that it is impossible for a church website to edify and connect believers and be attractive to unbelievers at the same time.

I’m not saying it’s impossible, but I have found very few who do it well. Again, the natural tendency for a Christian webmaster or web team, directed by a pastoral leadership team, is 1) to provide resources for members and attendees first; and, 2) target unbelievers second. Given the lack of resources most churches have, what happens is that the website tries to accomplish the first goal but never gets to the second. Since the end result largely accomplishes the purpose envisioned by the pastoral leadership team, the webmaster or web team is largely satisfied with a site which doesn’t target unbelievers. All I’m saying is that we should turn the goals around and target unbelievers first and then provide information for members and attendees as a secondary goal.

4) You noted my “heart for anti-church believers.” That’s not exactly what I was trying to convey.

As I see it (this is instinct - not researched opinion), we can probably divide unbelievers into three groups - 10% open to the church, 10% anti-church, and 80% indifferent to the church. It’s the 80% who are indifferent I want to reach. The 10% who are open to the church have a good chance of being reached with or without a website (although I’m happy when our websites help them along their journey). The 10% who are anti-church are, I agree, very difficult to reach. But the 80% who are indifferent are in a prime position to be influenced by church websites if they are developed with a bit of strategy in mind.

Hope that clarifies my thinking a little bit. I’m enjoying the conversation!

contributed on 03/09 at 02:30 PM
continues the discussion:

Bobby:

Thanks for contributing. Regarding this statement in your comment: “We get calls and e-mails from people looking for relatives or children that might have run away from home and ended up in Savannah. We have experienced numerous success stories from this new found ministry.” I’m curious to know what happens after you get the call or email. How does the church follow up on these to bring the stories to a “successful” completion?

contributed on 03/09 at 02:36 PM
Ronald May continues the discussion:

Frank, as I skimmed through these articles I seen a division between the purpose of a web site for believers and non believers. Shouldn’t the life style of the believer be what compels the lost to come in. The Christian lifestyle should have the blessings of God through what Jesus accomplished on the cross being present in their lives. The fruit of the Spirit should be present regardless of the situation the believer is going through. We have and adocate with the Father that anything we ask in His name He will give us to glorify the Father through Him. When we read the promises in the Bible we have the confidents that all things work for the good for those who love God and are called according to His purpose. These are the things that the believer should walk in and be taught, while the unbeliever looks on the sidelines and says “I wish I had some of that.” The Christian life is all about servanthood to others. When I get a step ladder and get over my selfish desires and look to others, being believers or unbelievers, God releases the power of His Holy Spirit in my life. This draws both the believer and non-believer to God.

I try to form my web site for an evangelistical pull by sharing how God has worked in the lives of others. I have not been able to spend a lot of energy on this, that is why I am still on the free status with it.
When a website show the ministry of reaching out to others, the believer should say in his heart, “I want to be a part of that” and the unbeliever then says, “I want what they have.” Does this make sense? Maybe I am out in left field, but I think as we do the work of Christ others will be drawn in. Christianity is not a buffet where I can pick and choose. There is only one way and it is Christ and His example. Find His example and go for your web site.

contributed on 03/10 at 03:57 AM
Christian Web Trends Blog continues the discussion:

Frank,

I’m enjoying the conversation as well.  You’re last message helped clarify a lot of things for me.  I really don’t think we are all that far apart in our opinions.

It sounds to me as though you’re not saying a church should not use its website to help it’s members get connected, serving, and growing spiritually, but instead that it is rarely done in a way that is attractive and compelling to an unchurched person.  I agree with that.

It takes real intentionality for a church to make its website useful to believers and appealing to the unchurched.  It also takes a good bit of understanding about what things attract and repel unbelievers today.  One of my goals for the Christian Web Trends blog is to help churches who really do want to reach the unchurched to understand how to do that.  I know that’s one of your goals here as well.

Paul Steinbrueck
OurChurch.Com

contributed on 03/10 at 05:46 AM
Frank White continues the discussion:

Gentlemen, I just wanted to say that after reading this blog you have giving me alot of food for thought. My website has been mostly there for our membership. Understand we are not a fixed church home. Our ministry is in the campgrounds across America. So we try to let membership know about rally times etc. etc. But I think the idea of Pauls and Franks are equally valid.

I feel as though we can accomplish reaching those that do not know the Lord as we do, But it is very important to have a connection with the Membership.We can do this to edify and build up the members so they are better equiped when the do meet people face to face. I wonder what one thing would even interest a nonbeliever from seeing a website? I think it takes many things to accomplish this like the real life stories etc.

At any rate I think I see where My site could use a little revamping all around to better serve membership and to possibly interest that person that checks it out that may not know the Lord.

Anyways, thanks for this Blog guys if nothing else it gives all of us food for thought to better serve our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

If any of you have any ideas for my site I would be delighted to hear them.

contributed on 03/10 at 11:24 AM
Bobby R. Awtrey continues the discussion:

Thanks for the question ..... “How do we follow up on e-mails and phone calls from people looking for run-a-way or missing children (and sometimes even adults) ...

Well, in order to be successful in this ministry ... means you must put a lot of wear on your soul ... the soul of your shoes that is ....

We have developed a long standing relationship with many of the ‘long term’ homeless (those that are satisified to just make it on the streets ... it is surprising how helpful they can be in pointing you to ‘new arrivals’ ...that seem to vanish into the community .... but God has eyes all over ... and prayer put to pratice with effort reveals much ...

We also work closely with many of the local high school and college clubs .... not judging them ... but trying to gain their trust by exposing them to ‘christianity in action’ ...which means letting God’s light shine by letting your yes mean yes and your no mean no ...not compromising ...but being a constant. Loving them where they are ...and ministering to them one on one. This leads to trust which in turn leads us to many run-a-ways.

We work with the Savannah Crime Commission, we have developed a circle of prayer partners from all of the Islands churches (the pastors) ... putting aside the ‘Big Church vs the Small church’ ... and simply come as leaders of God’s church to pray and seek knowledge, wisdom and guidance ..to help us help others.

The list goes on and on of things that we do ... some work ...some don’t ... so we move on ... never giving up ...but always looking up.  There is no where a person can hide from God ... and through prayer ... God leads us to assist and unite many familes .... but as you know .... with success we also face failures ... we have been to late at times ... and it hurts ... but at least we can be a part of brining some pain for a family in doubt ....to a close.

The Internet ministry has been a great one for us. But as with any ministry it takes time and committment. you have to put legs to the prayers ... and I have traveled from Savannah to many places just to visit and pray with someone that was looking for God in cyberspace ... and God saw fit to lead them to The Lighthouse ... and gave us the desire and the resources to reach out and show just how big God’s arms are ....

We Praise Hime, We Thank Him, We Serve Him .... We Believe all things are possible ... and he proves it daily.

contributed on 03/12 at 06:40 AM
Paul Hollis continues the discussion:

Hello Frank,

Just to let you know I reached your blog from an excerpt of this discussion as provided by an e-newsletter from http://guide.gospelcom.net/; they seem to be a great resource for e-evangelism-related information.

I couldn’t agree with your commentary more. Un-churched people generally have no interest in church; so typically they would have no interest in going onto a church website. It’s been sort of philosophy or pet peeve of mine for a long time; that we engage more un-churched people effectively by relating to them where they are; which means relationally; primarily through our relationships at work, civic organizations, PTA or PTO, or participation in recreational activities, and so on.

With regard to a church website; I personally feel that a strategy for a church to have for reaching the un-churched would be to provide a website that has content pertinent to the interests that we all have in our community and culture. Topics for content that are common to all could include health/fitness, parenting, financial planning, sports/hobbies, etc.

A page could be incorporated into the website that might discuss reinforcing good behavior in your children, good citizenship, philanthropy, or similar topics. Then it may be possible to segue into bring up religion in a topical format. Maybe the website could include links to the church website; should the visitor be interested to navigate there for more information.

Possibly the site could include a simple apologetic about Christian belief. It could be that the website is hosted by a lay-person within the church or a group of church members that are not necessarily affiliated with the church.

This form of evangelism is an area that I personally have a heart for. I’m in the process of developing some blogs, podcasts, and websites on my own; to utilize these tools and inform other believers and church entities about there relevance.

I think because a lot of this technology is new and ever-evolving, it is hard for a lot of people to get their arms around it and not feel intimidated by it. I believe with the right orientation and instruction, many people in the church body can publish their own content to use in personal evangelism. Or it maybe the role for some, who don’t feel inclined to create content, is to disseminate the information through email correspondence, chat-room and forum posting, or simply forwarding e-newsletters to people in their address books. 

At any rate, I think the more we can do to eliminate the disconnect between technology and how it’s perceived by non-technical people, which probably includes most of us; then greater the likelihood these forms of media can be used to saturate our culture with the saving message of Christ.

OK, I’m probably preaching to the choir; so I’ll step off the soap-box now. I appreciate your contribution and your insight and look forward to collecting more food for thought to help further my education on such an exciting and vital medium for reaching believers and non-believers alike.

Every Blessing,

Paul
aboutbelief.com
whattayathink.com
askavenues.com

contributed on 03/20 at 03:16 PM
Apostle Paul Johnson Asamoah continues the discussion:

Please best the way we use to reach hem is that by share and adding what they have like going to them where ever they are, like school method, ideas method, culture method, football method, food method clothing method, etc.
hoping is clear now, I think this is the best ways to reach them so please to Africa GHANA TO Reach them God’s wish to win them in Jesus name.

contributed on 11/07 at 10:21 PM
Add To The Collective Voice!
Comments must be approved by the Strategic Digital Outreach team before they are made public on the site.

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


Next entry: There's A Day On The Way: May 7

Previous entry: Sidebar Changes

<< Back to main